Post admission checks

This discussion group covers new ideas, requests for features and prioritisation of what is to be implemented next.

Moderators: bugfinder, ortiz

Post admission checks

Postby sean » Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:30 am

Once an End-device has been admitted to the LAN (valid MAC etc.), what additional activities can we do, as follow up, to reduce risks?

. Query the Anti-Virus server (if there is one) and report online PCS with AVs out of date
. Query the WSUS server (if there is one) and report online PCS with Windows patches out of date?
. monitor for a MAC used on more than one port within one minute
. Add packet fence as an additional measure?
. Report "hubs" and compare it against a list of authorised hubs?

Feel free to add to this list, should help us in planning ..
sean
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Switzerland

Check admin permissions

Postby megalore » Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:29 pm

Hi,

In a technological advance company, i'm faced with a problem that some users remove admin access to their machines (AV monitoring, Asset management, etc).
Wouldn't it be great if i could check after MAC validation if i have admin access to the machine and then remove them or not from the main vlan?
megalore
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:21 pm

Postby sean » Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:57 am

You'd need an agent on each PC to do that, but I can understand the need in some environments.
sean
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Switzerland

Postby megalore » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:57 pm

Yes, sure

But it could be made simplier and also powerfull.
A simple check with a NETBIOS connection to the machine with a predefined user/password should be enough to check for local firewalls and admin removal.

Are you interested? :)
megalore
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:21 pm

Postby sean » Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:30 pm

Well there are free tools such as emum3 (not sure of the exact name), that could extract lots of nice useful information (services, software), that could also be stored in the DB, to improve inventory data significantly.

Of course you need the appropriate domain rights, and nthe tools would have to run on a windows box

But my problem is a lack of time right now, are you proposing yourself?
sean
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Switzerland

Postby megalore » Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:34 pm

I think i'm not explaining myself right, this would have to be done *without* installing anything on the machine.
For instance, i have some scripts that pull all kinds of information from machines without installing anything on them (just need access and rights, exactly what i want to check). This would be something similar, but i don't know how, if possible, to integrate these on your NAC.

Installing anything on the machines creates me another problem i have right now with the current inventory software...

I'm not a programmer, but i'm always open to new challenges and i'm sure i can contribute with great ideas for this issue if pointed in the right direction :)

Thanks
megalore
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:21 pm

Postby sean » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:15 pm

The enum3 software can yes, be run remotely. It would not require an agent. But an interface to NAC woiuld have to be written, but the idea is interesting yes.

We have to think about a general policy interface that would allow such tools to be integrated.
sean
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Switzerland

Postby megalore » Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:41 am

Great!

In the mean time, i will spend some time trying your product.

Thanks
megalore
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:21 pm

Postby sje » Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:54 pm

Not a NAC solution but I think you could create a group policy for the machines that could force the Domain Admin group into the local Administrators group.

Or take away the local users admin rights. ;)
sje
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:39 pm

Postby megalore » Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:47 pm

Unfortunately, GPO just allows me to create the local Administrators group as a whole, not add/remove single users to the already existing ones. And removing the users local admin rights would be great, if it wasn't impossible :)

But thanks for the tips!
megalore
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:21 pm

Postby sean » Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:17 pm

Could you not have some kind of logon script that verifies the current list against an allow list, and adapts the membership accordingly?

So if a user managed to get local admin, after the next logon it would be gone again?
sean
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Switzerland

Postby megalore » Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:23 pm

Yes, that could be done, the problem is i cannot remove local admin rights, or else the users would not be able to work properly (mostly developers).
Hence my never ending quest for solutions to "catch" the misbeaving ones... :D
megalore
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:21 pm

Postby stevemike11 » Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:22 pm

the problem is i cannot remove local admin rights
stevemike11
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: portland


Return to Roadmap + Feature Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron